![]() ![]() It also mentions Ajax's shame and intention of suicide after killing Agamemnon and Menelaus when they gave Achilles's armor to Oddyseus. It talks about how the play began with the death of Achilles and Ajax's desire to be rewarded with his armor. The next chapter provides the original text of Sophocles's play about Ajax. It looks into the Odyssey, which provides the earliest reference of Sophocles being concerned with Ajax. The introductory chapter focuses on Ajax, as one of the major characters in Homer's Iliadand the only hero in the story that never received direct help from a god. This edition attempts to show that Sophocles offers no easy answer to the question of why Ajax falls, and no simple solution to the problem of how we ought to live so as to avoid tragedy in our own lives. Suggestions about how fork should be done, etc.Ajax, perhaps the earliest surviving tragedy of Sophocles, presents the downfall and disgrace of a great hero whose suicide leads to his rehabilitation through the enlightened magnanimity of one of his enemies. Never work”, or “prove it!”, or “why don't you fork it”, or (as opposed to, say, saying it's wrong place to discuss, or “it'll Help by discussing facts, being positive in general and stay on topic. So, whenever this argument about modernization of emacsĬomes up, and if you think there are valid points in this, you can Usual term used among tech geekers today is “contructive criticism ![]() One way you can help the cause, is by helping to dispell myths. ![]() Guy quite few years to come into shape, and he's not shy about asking Perhaps 10 or 100 times smaller.) Nevertheless, it took the Aquamacs (the changes inĪquamacs in comparison to Xemacs back then, in terms of manpower, is Years ago, is really just few trivial UI changes. Thus theĪquamacs, in comparison to Xemacs in its historical context some 20 The collaboration with GNU Emacs, mainly Richard M Stallman (RMS),įinally can't work out for multitudes of reasons that are oftenĪttributed to RMS's character and GNU project's snail speed. The company's eventual commercial goal, was to produce a commercial Inc in the Lisp machine and Artificial Intelligence days (1980s), and Xemacs, started as Lucid Emacs, was run by a commercial company Lucid Still, a couple years of full time job to After all you do believe a majority preferred > If you think there are enough users out there, you should be able to > the associated tasks of running a website with public annoucement and > The actually coding part for the latter will prob be dwarfed by all > modernization, or i actually take things into my hands and start my > So, either i try to spend tons of time to be the salesman for emacs > Just make sure you stay as compatible as possible so that no work is If any suggestion in the human world needs to be proven first, nothing ![]() Thus needs to see the light to be proven. I hope you are not suggesting that my suggestions are totally fringe > it is the most effective (and perhaps only) way of proving your point: I don't think it's the best way to make such a change, but > coder and fork it, like Xemacs and Aquamacs did. > The most effective way to make such change, is just have a capable > distro that's just my ideal of what functional, BEST efficient, > I just might down the road start my own emacs cult. On Jul 29, 4:13 am, Nikolaj Schumacher wrote: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |